Nasty Chicks Sexual Chicks

Money Nastysexualchicks El Go About Nasty Sexual Chicks CLS Bulletin online

Money Nastysexualchicks El Go About Nasty Sexual Chicks

Another advantage can be seen in a probable uprising to a higher level of competition among the universities. A university dependent on the fees of its students will try harder to keep the students satisfied about the quality of the education than a totally tax-financed university does, because it will get the money regardless of how many students there are and how good the education is.

Therefore the question arises to what extent the universities should be free to fix the amount of their tuition fees themselves, because this would really promote competition among the universities: The better the education is the more money the university can charge, the more money it costs the higher the teaching staff can be paid. High salaries for the teachers will attract the best academics to become university teachers – instead of working in private economy or even going abroad. A too extended freedom to set the amount of study fees however could lead to social injustice, for not the best but only the richest students will be able to afford the best education. 

By this I already mentioned the most questionable issue in connection with tuition fees: The question of social justice. Critics fear that tuition fees would allow the children of wealthier households to study at the universities while the less wealthy people would rather choose not to study in order to avoid getting into debts. By that the gap between poor and rich people in the society would even grow – since the average life income of an academic is and will still be much higher than the non-academic’s average life income. And for sure less educated people will tend rather not to choose for such a high financial risk in order to open better chances for their children, because an investment in an academic education is an investment in something they don’t know. Better-educated people however will rather send their children to the universities, for they experienced themselves that an academic education on the long run will pay off financially and outweigh the short-term disadvantages. 

When talking about social justice we also shouldn’t forget that even in a system of free academic education the wealthier social layers have a much higher benefit from the taxpayers’ expenses for education than the lower social layers which don’t send their children to universities that often. In Germany for example it is generally connected to costs to send a child to a kindergarten, while an academic education is basically free. A popular argument in favour of tuition fees in Germany therefore is the claim that it would be unjust that a low-paid cleaning lady pays for the manager’s child’s education at university, while she herself even has to pay for the most basic type of education for her own child.

One answer to the question of social justice could be seen in the Swedish Model, where education is generally for free from the kindergarten until the academic degree, and where a comparatively very high percentage of people at least reach the school graduation that allows them to go to a university. This model probably gets closest to the ideal of equal chances for education to everybody, and – assumed that the educational level at the universities is high – gets most people into a good professional education. But there is one disadvantage about that model which is probably decisive for most Central European states considering the state budgets’ situation these days: It is very expensive and would have the consequence of a necessary rise of the tax level.

nMoney Nastysexualchicks El Go About Nasty Sexual Chicks CLS Bulletin onlinea o Nasty zMoney Nastysexualchicks El Go About Nasty Sexual Chicks CLS Bulletin onlinew Chicks